Selene Kaye, Women's Rights Project
This user hasn't shared any biographical information
Homepage: http://www.aclu.org/blog
Posts by Selene Kaye, Women's Rights Project
Who Owns Your Genes? You Do.
originally posted by Selene Kaye, Women's Rights Project for Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union [click here]
March 30, 2010 - 2:18 pm
Posted in brca | No comments
On Monday, federal district court Judge Robert Sweet made history by issuing the first ruling ever that human genes can’t be patented.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has been issuing patents on human genes for over 20 years, giving private corporations, individuals, and universities exclusive rights to those genes and to test, study, or even look at them. This is the first time a court has said that this practice is unlawful.
Late Monday afternoon, the judge issued his decision in our breast cancer gene patents lawsuit, which challenges the government’s granting of and Myriad Genetics’ control of patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 human genes, which are associated with breast and ovarian cancer.
The judge declared that all 15 patent claims that we challenged are invalid, based on the fact that they cover products of nature and abstract ideas. He wrote in his decision:
The resolution of these motions is based upon long recognized principles of molecular biology and genetics: DNA represents the physical embodiment of biological information, distinct in its essential characteristics from any other chemical found in nature. It is concluded that DNA’s existence in an “isolated” form alters neither this fundamental quality of DNA as it exists in the body nor the information it encodes. Therefore, the patents at issue directed to “isolated DNA” containing sequences found in nature are unsustainable as a matter of law and are deemed unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
(You can read more about our legal arguments here and here.)
The judge ruled that Myriad’s claim — that the “isolation” of the BRCA genes from the surrounding DNA makes them into something distinct and patentable — is fundamentally flawed and nothing more than semantics:
Many, however, including scientists in the field of molecular biology and genomics, have considered this practice a “lawyer’s trick” that circumvents the prohibitions on the direct patenting of the DNA in our bodies but which, in practice, reaches the same result.
This is a huge victory for women’s health and scientific freedom. Myriad has already said that they will appeal, but if this decision is upheld, it will mean that the thousands of researchers and clinicians who have the ability to conduct BRCA testing and provide results to women, will no longer be prohibited from doing so. This could well mean that the price of this test will come down, making it accessible to many women for whom the current cost (Myriad charges over $3,000) is prohibitive. It would also mean that our six individual women plaintiffs and the thousands of other women affected by hereditary breast and ovarian cancer can more freely access critical information about their own genetics, such as getting a second opinion before taking drastic preventative measures like mastectomy or having their ovaries removed. Finally, it would mean that the PTO would change its policy and no longer issue patents on human genes.
The judge noted the significance of his decision:
The resolution of the issues presented to this Court deeply concerns breast cancer patients, medical professionals, researchers, caregivers, advocacy groups, existing gene patent holders and their investors, and those seeking to advance public health.
Because our lawsuit challenges the whole notion of gene patenting, this decision could have far-reaching effects beyond the BRCA genes. Approximately 20 percent of all human genes have been patented, including genes associated with Alzheimer’s disease, muscular dystrophy, colon cancer, asthma, and many other illnesses.
This is a moment of triumph for our plaintiffs, but the fight is not over. Stay tuned, and if you haven’t already, be sure to watch a video of our plaintiffs and sign a message of support for them at www.aclu.org/brca.
Revaluing “Women’s Work:” Ending the Exploitation and Abuse of Domestic Workers
originally posted by Selene Kaye, Women's Rights Project for Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union [click here]
March 10, 2010 - 12:02 pm
Posted in Uncategorized | No comments
A reminder to those of you in the New York area to join us tomorrow at the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women for a film screening and discussion about the human rights of domestic workers.
For decades, nannies, caregivers, and housekeepers have been excluded from most U.S. labor protections – a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the undervaluation of "women’s work." The lack of regulation combined with the isolated nature of domestic work makes these women particularly vulnerable to human rights abuses, breeding the global phenomenon of human trafficking.
As the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women undertakes a 15-year review of the implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, this public forum will call attention to the failure of the U.S. and other governments to live up to their obligations under international human rights law to protect this critical workforce.
The event will begin with a screening of Behind Closed Doors, a short documentary film about the exploitation and labor trafficking of South Asian women as domestic workers in the United States. The filmmakers, Pracheta Sharma and Jessica Hopper, will introduce the film, which will be followed by a panel discussion with domestic workers and advocates engaged in local, national, and international movements to protect the human rights of domestic workers and re-value their labor.
What: Revaluing "Women’s Work:" Ending the Exploitation and Abuse of Domestic Workers
When: Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 6:00pm
Where: U.N. Church Center, 10th Floor, 777 U.N. Plaza (44th St. and First Ave.), New York, NY
This event is free and open to the public.