Troy Davis
NC: Governor Vetoes Repeal of Racial Justice Act
0North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue today vetoed a bill that would have repealed the two-year old Racial Justice Act that allows death-row inmates to appeal their sentences based on statistical proof of racial bias.
“I am–and always will be–a strong supporter of the death penalty,” Perdue said in a statement to the News Observer. “I firmly believe that some crimes are so heinous that no other punishment is adequate. As long as I am governor, I am committed to ensuring that the death penalty remains a viable punishment option in North Carolina in appropriate cases.”
The governor went on to say it’s important the death penalty be given “fairly and that the process not be infected with prejudice based on race.”
Antone De’Jaun Correia Writes Obituary For His Uncle, Troy Davis
0On Saturday, the UK’s Guardian published an obituary for Troy Davis written by his 17-year-old nephew, Antone De’Jaun Davis Correia.
Up until shortly before Davis will executed, his nephew visited him every other week from the day he was born. Only July 17, 2007, a then-13-year-old De’Jaun sat in a courtroom and listened to a judge announce his uncle’s first execution date. “We went to go see him, and he wasn’t really worrying about himself. He was mostly worried about his family. About us. I was looking at my grandmother. She was praying, praying, praying. It was a lot of people constantly praying, constantly praying,” De’Jaun told Colorlines.com earlier this year. He says he remembers that court date vividly.
In the obituary, De’Jaun says Davis “became a father figure to me” until his execution in September.
It’s been an unimaginably difficult year for the boy. In May, De’Jaun lost his grandmother. Then, earlier this month, his mother Martina Davis Correia lost her courageous battle with breast cancer.
Troy Davis holding a young Antone De’Jaun. (Images courtesy of the Davis Family/Jen Marlowe) The obituary was written days before his mother passed away on December 1, 2011. Here’s an excerpt:
My uncle, Troy Davis, was arrested in 1989 and sentenced to death in 1991, three years before I was born. He was in jail my whole life, but I knew him very well. I visited him with my mother – his sister – on death row in the Georgia state prison every other week until his execution in September and he became a father figure to me.
Troy was wise, respectful, motivated and a great listener. He didn’t like the position he was in but said he had to learn from it, and used that experience to give me advice. He told me to pick the right friends and not to run away when things got rough; to keep my head up in school and take criticism positively. My uncle was a good family man before he went to prison. My grandma used to tell me that when he got a paycheck he’d give half to her to help pay the bills at home. He was responsible and respectful from a young age.
On 19 August 1989 a police officer called Mark MacPhail was shot dead in a car park in Savannah. My uncle was there at the time and, based on eyewitness testimony, the police decided he’d done it – but they had the wrong person from the get-go. Later we got lawyers to go through the case. They did very rigorous investigations and found there was no evidence to prove my uncle committed the crime – no DNA, no gunpowder residue, nothing at all. Most of the witnesses withdrew their original statements, and another man was implicated in the murder. We appealed, and the execution was stayed three times over the past four years, but on 21 September 2011 Troy was killed by lethal injection.
It was a tough time for my family. My grandma had died in May, so we lost two important parts of the family in the space of five months, but I think we coped pretty well. You’ve just got to learn from things and keep moving. My uncle’s death opened a big can of worms for Georgia and all the other death-row states. The case provoked a huge amount of debate in the US, and we received support from people all over the world.
“He told me, just continue to do good in school, do what’s right, pick
the right friends, watch over the family, and just respect the family.
Respect my mom, my grandmother, my aunties,” De’Jaun said about his uncle to Colorlines earlier this year. “Do what you love and have a
good profession.”
“What Troy did for me in my life will never be forgotten,” De’Jaun said in Saturday’s obituary.
De’Jaun hopes to go to Georgia Tech to study robotic engineering.
A Sister Who Fought for Her Brother’s Life, While Clinging to Her Own
0Editor’s note: Colorlines.com contributor Jen Marlowe wrote and circulated the open letter below following the death of Martina Davis-Correia, sister of Troy Davis. Marlowe wrote for Colorlines.com about the Davis family’s fight to stop his execution.
It’s impossible to find adequate words to describe Martina Davis-Correia. Indomitable. Courageous. Warrior. Hero. Words don’t do justice to force of nature that was (that is) Martina.
I first saw Martina on Democracy Now! in July 2007, just after her brother Troy Davis had survived his first execution date, coming within 23 hours of death by lethal injection by the state of Georgia, despite a strong case of innocence. She spoke about her twin struggle for her brother’s life, and for her own life. Martina had been diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer on March 29, 2001. At that time, she was given six months to live.
On March 28, 2011, Martina woke up with the knowledge that she had, on that very day, survived 10 years, rather than the predicted six months. Her joy was short-lived. Later that day, she received a call from Troy’s lawyers. The U.S. Supreme Court had denied Troy’s final appeal, paving the way for his execution.
Martina’s fight for her own life and for Troy’s life were always intertwined. Martina and Troy had always been, as their mother Virginia said, two peas in a pod. “Twin struggles,” Martina told me once. “Twin souls.”
When the state of Georgia set Troy’s execution date, for Sept. 21, Martina all but busted out of the hospital in order to be there, with and for Troy, in his final days. She was physically weak, she was wheelchair-bound, but her spirit was larger than life. At a press conference across the street from the prison, just hours before the scheduled time of execution, Martina steadied herself by putting her hand on her son De’Jaun’s shoulder. “I am here to tell you that I’m going to stand for my brother today,” she said, rising from her wheelchair. “I am Troy Davis. You are Troy Davis. We are Troy Davis.”
There were three excruciating hours that night in the prison yard, waiting for the Supreme Court to make a decision on whether or not the execution would be stayed. At approximately 10:30 p.m., the answer came down: there would be no stay. The execution of Troy Davis would proceed, effective immediately. There was no way to know, in the minutes that followed, the exact timing of what was happening to Troy. We could only imagine–or try not to imagine–what stage in the process of the execution was occurring.
Just after 11 p.m., I was standing with Laura Moye, Amnesty International’s death penalty abolition campaign director. Martina was sitting in her wheelchair a few feet away. “Laura, come here, I need to tell you something,” she said in a voice so weak I had to strain to hear her. Laura and I exchanged a quick glance. Whatever Martina needed to tell her at that moment, it must be profound. Martina took the arm of a young woman standing next to her as Laura approached. “I want you to meet this woman. She drove all the way from San Francisco by herself to be here tonight. I want you to get her hooked up with the activists in California, make sure she’s a part of the movement.”
As Laura and the young woman exchanged contact information, photojournalist Scott Langley snapped a picture. The photo was taken at 11:08 p.m.
11:08 p.m., we later learned, was the exact moment that Troy succumbed to lethal injection.
What was Martina Davis-Correia doing at the exact moment Troy was killed? She was enlisting another recruit to bring down the system that killed her brother. She was bringing one more soldier to the fight for justice.
That was the essence of Martina. That was the spirit of Martina. There are hundreds of us, if not thousands, who have been touched by Martina, changed by Martina. And Martina’s essence and spirit will be in all parts of our struggle for a more just world.
We will never forget all that you taught us, Martina, and all that you meant to us.
And we will never stop fighting for all that you fought for until your very last breath, and beyond.
How You Can Help Now
With all that the Davis family has gone through, and the levels of stress/pain they have had to endure, my hope is that an additional financial burden will not be a cause of further hardship for them.
Funds need to be raised to pay for Martina’s funeral, and for the medical bills of her final week in the hospital.
If you are in a position to help, no matter how big or small the amount, I hope you will consider doing so.
Contributions via paypal can be made with the following email address: aug1970@bellsouth.net
Checks can be made out to:
“The Martina Davis-Correia Fund”
and sent to:
Capitol City Bank and Trust
339 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd
Savannah, GA 31419
Thank you so much for any help you may be able to offer the Davis family.
Jen Marlowe is a human rights activist, author and filmmaker. Her most recent book is “The Hour of Sunlight: One Palestinian’s Journey from Prisoner to Peacemaker” (Nation Books, 2011).
New Chance for Justice in Alabama
0This week we got the welcome news that the state of Alabama will not appeal a ruling ordering a new trial for ACLU client Montez Spradley, who was sentenced to death despite inadequate and very weak evidence, after his trial judge rejected the jury’s 10-2 vote for a life sentence .
As we’ve written before, Spradley, a young African-American man, has always vigorously maintained his innocence in the 2004 murder of a 58-year-old white grandmother in Birmingham, Alabama. The prosecution’s case against Spradley was alarmingly thin and riddled with inconsistencies, and in ordering a new trial the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals found that much of it was "improperly admitted."
The appeals courts’ decision to order a new trial was uplifting, especially in light of the recent execution of Troy Davis amid grave doubts about his guilt. With a new trial for Spradley, we may finally achieve real justice.
Learn more about the death penalty: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Fewer Americans Supporting the Death Penalty
0Is it that the State of Georgia executed an innocent man last month? Is it the dawning realization that the risk of executing an innocent person exists in many cases beyond Troy Davis? Is it that race cannot help but to seep into the consideration of who gets executed and who gets to live? Is it that the quality of the lawyering and not the seriousness of the crime determines who gets executed? Is it that many family members of murder victims have said not to execute in their names? Or is it the simple realization that the state killing people does not teach its citizens not to kill?
Whatever the reasons, Americans are coming around to the thinking of most other nations that the death penalty is an anachronism that can be left to the dustbin of history. In the wake of New York, New Jersey, New Mexico and Illinois’ recent repeals of the death penalty — and with possible repeal in California in sight — two new polls show significant declines in national support for the death penalty.
In a recent CNN poll, only 48 percent of respondents preferred a death sentence over a sentence of life without parole, down from 56 percent seven years ago. Meanwhile, fully 50 percent of respondents now believe life without parole is the preferable punishment. A recent Gallup poll reflected this same downward trend (though with more support for the death penalty). It found that now only 61 percent of Americans approve of using the death penalty for persons convicted of murder, down from 64 percent last year — the lowest level of support since 1972.
With these polls as further evidence that our message is taking the hold, the ACLU will continue to work to show that the death penalty is unjust, unwise and unnecessary.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post misworded the findings of the CNN poll. This has been corrected.
Learn more about the death penalty: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Breaking the Addiction to Incarceration: Weekly Highlights
0Today, the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. With over 2.3 million men and women living behind bars, our imprisonment rate is the highest it’s ever been in U.S. history. And yet, our criminal justice system has failed on every count: public safety, fairness and cost-effectiveness. Across the country, the criminal justice reform conversation is heating up. Each week, we feature our some of the most exciting and relevant news in overincarceration discourse that we’ve spotted from the previous week. Check back weekly for our top picks.
ACLU releases report detailing jail overcrowding in California
The ACLU and the ACLU of Southern California released a report last week detailing a pattern of severe and pervasive abuse of inmates in Los Angeles County jails. California’s severely bloated prison system has contributed to such inhumane conditions, which the Supreme Court found unconstitutional earlier this year. As California’s counties attempt to implement the state’s solution to the overcrowding – the “realignment” plan moving certain inmates to county jails – the ACLU continues to closely monitor incarceration conditions and assist counties in implementing the new law.
- Check out the coverage on: The Rachel Maddow Show, MSNBC, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times.
- Watch this video from the ACLU of California about the abuse, and this video of a chaplain’s account of what he saw.
- Read our blog post about the report.
- Take Action: Demand An Investigation into LA County Jails Violence.
ACLU Overincarceration Campaign highlighted in the media
The New York Times covered the growing movement in states across the country to reduce prison populations and the ACLU’s campaign. A Reuters piece also covered the benefits of reforms to end overincarceration. Both articles mentioned our Smart Reform is Possible report, released in August.
New York Times highlights the dangers of prosecutorial leverage
Last week’s Times article exposed only the tip of the iceberg of our dysfunctional criminal justice system. ACLU Policy Counsel Inimai Chettiar wrote for the American Constitution Society detailing additional factors contributing to mass incarceration, including excessive use of pre-trial detention and underfunded indigent defense systems.
The execution of Troy Davis
September marked a tragic and shameful moment in United States history when the state of Georgia executed Troy Davis, a man about whose guilt millions around the world and at home still have grave doubts.
- Read a New York Times article discussing the death penalty in the wake of Davis’ execution and quoting Denny LeBoeuf, director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project.
- Read a blog by ACLU Policy Counsel Tanya Greene on the night of Davis execution as well as our other blogs on the topic.
- As part of our longstanding campaign to end the death penalty, we have launched an interactive map highlighting state-specific actions to abolish the death penalty.
Learn more about overincarceration: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Breaking the Addiction to Incarceration: Weekly Highlights
0Today, the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. With over 2.3 million men and women living behind bars, our imprisonment rate is the highest it’s ever been in U.S. history. And yet, our criminal justice system has failed on every count: public safety, fairness and cost-effectiveness. Across the country, the criminal justice reform conversation is heating up. Each week, we feature our some of the most exciting and relevant news in overincarceration discourse that we’ve spotted from the previous week. Check back weekly for our top picks.
ACLU releases report detailing jail overcrowding in California
The ACLU and the ACLU of Southern California released a report last week detailing a pattern of severe and pervasive abuse of inmates in Los Angeles County jails. California’s severely bloated prison system has contributed to such inhumane conditions, which the Supreme Court found unconstitutional earlier this year. As California’s counties attempt to implement the state’s solution to the overcrowding – the “realignment” plan moving certain inmates to county jails – the ACLU continues to closely monitor incarceration conditions and assist counties in implementing the new law.
- Check out the coverage on: The Rachel Maddow Show, MSNBC, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times.
- Watch this video from the ACLU of California about the abuse, and this video of a chaplain’s account of what he saw.
- Read our blog post about the report.
- Take Action: Demand An Investigation into LA County Jails Violence.
ACLU Overincarceration Campaign highlighted in the media
The New York Times covered the growing movement in states across the country to reduce prison populations and the ACLU’s campaign. A Reuters piece also covered the benefits of reforms to end overincarceration. Both articles mentioned our Smart Reform is Possible report, released in August.
New York Times highlights the dangers of prosecutorial leverage
Last week’s Times article exposed only the tip of the iceberg of our dysfunctional criminal justice system. ACLU Policy Counsel Inimai Chettiar wrote for the American Constitution Society detailing additional factors contributing to mass incarceration, including excessive use of pre-trial detention and underfunded indigent defense systems.
The execution of Troy Davis
September marked a tragic and shameful moment in United States history when the state of Georgia executed Troy Davis, a man about whose guilt millions around the world and at home still have grave doubts.
- Read a New York Times article discussing the death penalty in the wake of Davis’ execution and quoting Denny LeBoeuf, director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project.
- Read a blog by ACLU Policy Counsel Tanya Greene on the night of Davis execution as well as our other blogs on the topic.
- As part of our longstanding campaign to end the death penalty, we have launched an interactive map highlighting state-specific actions to abolish the death penalty.
Learn more about overincarceration: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Alabama Court Recognizes Miscarriage of Justice for ACLU Client
0On September 30, 2011, a unanimous Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals ordered a new trial for ACLU client Montez Spradley. Spradley, a young African-American man, has always maintained his innocence in the 2004 murder of a 58-year-old white grandmother in Birmingham, Alabama. No physical evidence or eyewitness testimony connected him to the murder.
Reversing Spradley’s conviction and death sentence on four separate grounds, the court recognized that multiple errors in his trial resulted in a "miscarriage of justice." The prosecution’s case against Spradley was alarmingly thin and riddled with inconsistencies, and the court found that the bulk of it was "improperly admitted."
This case also raised the issue of judicial overrides: though Spradley’s jury convicted him on the basis of this improperly admitted evidence, it did not think he should die. Ten out of 12 jurors at the trial recommended he receive a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. Unfortunately, the trial judge rejected the jury’s strong support for a life sentence, overriding the recommendation and sentencing Spradley to death. Spradley’s appeal raised numerous challenges to the judge’s override in his case, but the appellate court’s decision to order a new trial altogether meant it did not need to address this issue.
A report released earlier this year by the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) illustrated the unreliable, biased and arbitrary nature of such judicial overrides in Alabama, which are sadly all too common.
EJI’s report also revealed a disturbing trend among life-to-death override cases in Alabama: most occurred when the victim was white, as in Spradley’s case, even though most homicide victims in Alabama are black. The override system in Alabama is also largely responsible for the state leading the country in death sentences and executions per capita. More than 20 percent of Alabama’s condemned prisoners landed on death row though their juries voted for life. Fortunately, at least for now, Spradley will not be among them.
In ordering a new trial for Spradley, the Alabama court took very seriously the weak evidence used to convict him. The decision was a refreshing victory in the wake of Troy Davis’s recent execution in neighboring Georgia, despite substantial concerns about his guilt.
Learn more about judicial overrides: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Joining the Movement: Congress Takes Action to Abolish Federal Death Penalty
0It’s been more than a week now since the execution of Troy Davis. Protesters may no longer be standing vigil and the story may no longer be making front-page headlines. But one thing is certain: millions of Americans’ eyes have been opened to the injustice of the death penalty system in this country — and we aren’t going to forget.
Davis was executed last week in Georgia, despite serious concerns that he was wrongly convicted in 1989 of killing of a police officer. His story garnered international media attention. The world watched until the final moments when the U.S. Supreme Court denied his last-minute stay of execution.
Many of us have responded to Davis’ execution by taking action this week, calling on our leaders to abolish the death penalty once and for all. Observers speculate that the Davis case will reignite the movement to abolish the death penalty — a silver lining in what is otherwise a tragic example of a failing justice system.
Congress took action last week, too, by introducing a bill to abolish the death penalty under federal law. This bill would prevent federal courts from sentencing anyone to death and though it does not officially impact state courts, it may influence them. Currently, there are 58 people on federal death row who have been convicted and sentenced in federal courts.
Our justice system is broken and has previously sentenced 138 wrongfully convicted people to die. We know we will never have a perfect system, and we can’t accept a process that allows for the execution of an innocent person.
There has never been a better time join the movement and protect innocent lives. Contact your representative and express your support of H.R. 3051 to abolish the death penalty under federal law. Or take action to end the death penalty in your state now.
Learn more about the death penalty: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Troy Davis’s Legacy: A New, Deeply Personal Movement
0On Sept. 21, at 11:08 p.m., Martina Correia leaned forward in her wheelchair on the grounds of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson, Ga. Though weak from battling illness, she called out to Laura Moye, Amnesty USA’s death penalty abolition campaign director.
“Laura, come here. I want you to meet this young woman. She drove all the way from San Francisco to be here.” Correia asked Moye to be sure to plug the young woman into the abolition work taking place in California.
Neither Correia nor Moye had any way to know that at the exact moment Correia was recruiting the young activist into the movement, her brother, Troy Davis, had just succumbed to death by lethal injection.
The young woman was one of hundreds of thousands of people recruited, directly or indirectly, by Correia to the fight against her brother’s death sentence. Nearly a million wrote letters and signed petitions on behalf of Davis. In the weeks after Georgia set his execution date, thousands took to the streets and marched in Atlanta and thousands more marched around the world. On Sept. 21, over 600 made the journey to Jackson to protest the execution and stand in solidarity with Troy Davis’s family. It was an uproar, utterly unprecedented.
Almost exactly 20 years earlier, on the same prison grounds in Jackson, fewer than a dozen people were on hand for the execution of Warren McCleskey, a black man sentenced to death for killing a white police officer. There was no physical evidence that McCleskey was the shooter, leaving the state’s main evidence a man who testified McCleskey had confessed to him. For years, the state hid the fact that the witness was a police informant, and that the police had illegally created the testimony by placing the informant in McCleskey’s jail cell.
McCleskey the man is little remembered, but one of his appeals that reached the Supreme Court changed legal history. In McCleskey v. Kemp, the U.S. Supreme Court considered statistical evidence that Georgia’s death penalty is carried out in a racially discriminatory manner. The evidence was undisputed, but the Court understood that if a death sentence could be overturned by statistics showing racial disparities, then no part of the criminal justice system would be safe from legal challenge. Racial disparities far more yawning than those surrounding the death penalty exist in arrests, detention and sentencing.
So the Supreme Court created an impossible test: McCleskey must show the racial discrimination was intentional. That is, McCleskey could only prove racial discrimination if the district attorney or trial judge stepped forward and proclaimed that they had acted on the basis of race.
With McCleskey, the Supreme Court decided it would rather tolerate a racist criminal justice system than open the floodgates to legal challenges about the system’s racial disparities.
Troy Davis’s case, fought as hard in the courts as McCleskey’s, exposed another morally questionable judicial preference–for finality over truth. No matter how flawed the process that produces a conviction, the burden shifts to the convicted to prove claims of innocence. It is a standard designed to help the system bury its mistakes–in Troy’s case, quite literally so. The judiciary would rather get it done than get it right.
For the last 30 years, the battle over the death penalty has been contained inside courtrooms and on the pages of legal briefs. The judicial system, asked to judge the foundations of its own house, papered over the problems of racial bias and doubt.
But then something extraordinary happened, as support for Troy Davis grew. These fundamental problems of doubt and racial bias moved outside the confines of the judiciary and shifted–quite abruptly–from being legal questions to personal ones.
Correia is most responsible for making things personal. People were drawn to Troy Davis’s case because she insisted that people connect with her brother not as a convict or a death row inmate, but as a person. The connection between Troy and his supporters was at times literally made through his sister. In 2009, Correia patched Troy through from prison to a conference call with activists from Amnesty International.
“Everything is coming to a head and people are starting to wake up more and more,” Davis said on the call. “This is just the beginning of something … we’re going to win this fight, we’re going to continue to open these eyes, we’re going to continue to open these prison doors, we’re going to continue to hold accountable all those that are in charge of these unjust systems.”
As activists sought out who to hold accountable, it became clear that what Justice John Paul Stevens famously called the “machinery of death” is in fact made up of individual human beings, each with their own moral compass, and so each one morally accountable.
There is Larry Chisolm, the Chatham County district attorney, who put in the request for a death warrant. There is the Superior Court judge named Penny Freesmann who signed it. The man who set the actual date and time of execution is Brian Owens, commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections. Five human beings comprise the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Parole, three of whom voted to deny Davis clemency. A group of correctional officers walked Troy to the execution chamber. Prison nurses prepared the IV lines. Carlo Musso, a doctor, collected $18,000 for overseeing the execution. Warden Carl Humphrey ordered over 125 CERT officers to dress out in full riot gear and stand guard so that those inside the prison could carry out the killing.
But the most significant shift into the personal can be understood through the blue Amnesty USA t-shirts that Troy supporters have been wearing for years, with white letters spelling, “I Am Troy Davis.”
Initially, the t-shirts were a sign of solidarity with the plight of a possibly innocent man on death row. But many are now wearing them with a sense of anger and identification that is far wider and deeper than the issue of Davis’s innocence. Davis’s execution, the events leading up to it and the feelings growing out of it have mobilized those who have been targeted and under attack by our criminal justice apparatus, especially (but not only) young black men, particularly in the South, and their mothers, sisters, parents and grandparents. What was once primarily a badge of solidarity is now, for many, a declaration of identity.
These young black and brown men and women are taking to heart James Baldwin’s plea in “An Open Letter to My Sister, Angela Y. Davis” when she was awaiting trial: “we must fight for your life as though it were our own–which it is–and render impassable with our bodies the corridor to the gas chamber. For, if they take you in the morning, they will be coming for us that night.”
Angela Davis was acquitted, and years later in an essay advocating the abolition of not only the death penalty but the entire prison industrial complex, wrote that “we are fighting the same battles over and over again, but in doing so in community, we are ever enlarging, ever expanding our notion of freedom.”
It is a sentiment echoed by Troy Davis, who repeatedly stressed that “we need to continue to stand together and educate each other and don’t give up the fight.”
The fight is not metaphorical. There are people determined to end capital punishment, and there are people determined to use it. The latest battle took place Sept. 21, 2011, in Jackson, Ga. Inside, hundreds of people carried out their parts in the script for killing Troy Davis, while outside, hundreds more–including four busloads of students from Armstrong, Savannah State, Morehouse, Spelman and Atlanta University–stood, prayed, and raged in opposition.
One of the people in the crowd at Jackson that night was Cara McCleskey, Warren McCleskey’s now adult daughter. Twenty legal appeals and a small army of lawyers did not save her father’s life. The million people who rallied behind Troy did not save his. The battles against the death penalty and against the racism of our criminal justice system will, as Angela Davis predicted, continue to be fought over and over again.
But something profound has shifted. Millions have had their eyes opened due to Troy Davis. For others, he made visible what they already knew, through personal experience, about the racism embedded in the criminal justice system. Thousands of young, African American men and women in the South are declaring “I am Troy Davis” as if their lives depend on it. We are standing together in a moment of expansion, which, if seized with the love and fury that surrounded the Davis family in Jackson last week, could bring us all closer to free.
Jen Marlowe is a human rights activist, author and filmmaker. Her most recent book is “The Hour of Sunlight: One Palestinian’s Journey from Prisoner to Peacemaker” (Nation Books, 2011). Kung Li is the former executive director of the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta.